I did 800. I reserved it a few months ago, got almost-done, and the desktop I was using for the work crashed. I forgot all about it!
You're welcome to finish the last couple of entries, or if you like I'll get to them within a couple of weeks.

I'm really sorry, I must have completely forgotten about your 800 base reservation, I don't know why !
I certainly didn't note that information.
Thanks a lot for this new complete base !
I'll let you finish the exponents 59 and 60 if you want, because it would take me several weeks !

I certainly don't expect you to remember when I forgot!
OK, I'll handle 800^59 and 800^60 next month.

[QUOTE=VBCurtis;598040]I certainly don't expect you to remember when I forgot!
OK, I'll handle 800^59 and 800^60 next month.[/QUOTE]

OK, great !

As for me, [B]I will also start initializing the base 968[/B], but only up to exponent 42 !

[QUOTE=garambois;598072]OK, great !

As for me, [B]I will also start initializing the base 968[/B], but only up to exponent 42 ![/QUOTE]I can look at exponents 43 toward 60.

Base 70 table is fully initialized (I think). There are several merges (most already noted):[code]70^3:i23 merges with 1134:i2020
70^9:i3869 merges with 56910:i27
70^15:i370 merges with 1488:i7
70^29:i1113 merges with 19872:i4
70^72:i85 merges with 1074:i2[/code]Working on base 71. . .

OK, thank you very much for everything and for exponents 43 through 60 of base 968 too, because it's too big for me.
I will update on the weekend of February 5-6, 2022, as I really won't have much time until then.
Let's get our calculations as far ahead as possible by then.
This will be a major update with several new bases.

I'll start initializing base 99.

50^99 is done, only one index left for this base.

This was just too interesting to me not to share. Aliquot sequence 71^87 term 3 shed 74 digits in its single step to term 4. More like this would be nice.

[QUOTE=RichD;598297]I'll start initializing base 99.[/QUOTE]

Thanks a lot !

[QUOTE=kar_bon;598321]50^99 is done, only one index left for this base.[/QUOTE]

Thanks a lot !
Did you do the calculations yourself or is it yo-yo ?
Because I see that the 50^99 and 50^100 sequences were both reserved for yoyo.
Maybe this is a booking error, should I rectify ?