mersenneforum.org

mersenneforum.org (https://www.mersenneforum.org/index.php)
-   PrimeNet (https://www.mersenneforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=11)
-   -   OFFICIAL "SERVER PROBLEMS" THREAD (https://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=5758)

swl551 2014-04-01 21:55

I am adding email notification to MISFIT if the upload manager stays open for greater than 60 minutes.

swl551 2014-04-02 01:29

I cannot get to GIMPS site at all at this time.

swl551 2014-04-06 00:03

I cannot upload results from MISFIT at this time.

4/5/2014 8:01:08 PM:Error! The remote server returned an error: (502) Bad Gateway.

TheJudger 2014-04-06 16:15

Little progress in manual result parsing? This is new to me since last weekend when submitting manual P-1 results (using Prime95).
[CODE][...]
Processing result: M67445513 has a factor: 957335137716364549786177 ([COLOR="Red"]P-1, B1=615000[/COLOR])
[COLOR="Red"]Insufficient[/COLOR] information for accurate CPU credit.
For stats purposes, [COLOR="Red"]assuming[/COLOR] factor was found using [COLOR="Red"]P-1 with B1 = 800000[/COLOR].
CPU credit is 2.9322 GHz-days.
Processing result: M68009717 has a factor: 95082440509329612839041 ([COLOR="Red"]P-1, B1=665000, B2=14463750, E=12[/COLOR])
[COLOR="Red"]Insufficient[/COLOR] information for accurate CPU credit.
For stats purposes, [COLOR="Red"]assuming[/COLOR] factor was found using [COLOR="Red"]P-1 with B1 = 800000[/COLOR].
CPU credit is 2.9322 GHz-days.
[...][/CODE]

Oliver

James Heinrich 2014-04-06 18:21

[QUOTE=TheJudger;370435]Little progress in manual result parsing?[/QUOTE]Sorry, I'm very transient these days and have mostly been living out of my car for the last 2 weeks. I'll try and squeeze in some time within the next 3 weeks.

beduzar 2014-04-07 12:46

Problem down loading a result
 
Hello,

A failure occurred while sending a result. The automatic retry failed too because the result was supposed to be already done! At last this result does not appear on my user interface. So where is it?

[CODE][Worker #1 Apr 6 01:35] Iteration: 59200000 / 59295007 [99.83%]. Per iteration time: 0.023 sec.
[Worker #2 Apr 6 01:40] Iteration: 19700000 / 62283437 [31.62%]. Per iteration time: 0.024 sec.
[Worker #1 Apr 6 02:11] M59295007 is not prime. Res64: 624A13C5945F134A. We8: 8011874E,34113262,00000000
[Comm thread Apr 6 02:11] Sending result to server: UID: beduzar/vega, M59295007 is not prime. Res64: 624A13C5945F134A. We8: 8011874E,34113262,00000000, AID: ED617696E1D71C0F4D7624C19E98A451
[Comm thread Apr 6 02:11]
[Worker #1 Apr 6 02:11] Starting primality test of M62423843 using AVX FFT length 3360K, Pass1=448, Pass2=7680
[Comm thread Apr 6 02:14] CURL library error: Operation timed out after 180000 milliseconds with 0 bytes received
[Comm thread Apr 6 02:14] CURL library error: Operation timed out after 180000 milliseconds with 0 bytes received
[Comm thread Apr 6 02:14] Visit http://mersenneforum.org for help.
[Comm thread Apr 6 02:14] Will try contacting server again in 70 minutes.
[Worker #2 Apr 6 02:20] Iteration: 19800000 / 62283437 [31.79%]. Per iteration time: 0.024 sec.
[Worker #1 Apr 6 02:51] Iteration: 100000 / 62423843 [0.16%]. Per iteration time: 0.024 sec.
[Worker #2 Apr 6 03:00] Iteration: 19900000 / 62283437 [31.95%]. Per iteration time: 0.024 sec.
[Comm thread Apr 6 03:24] Sending result to server: UID: beduzar/vega, M59295007 is not prime. Res64: 624A13C5945F134A. We8: 8011874E,34113262,00000000, AID: ED617696E1D71C0F4D7624C19E98A451
[Comm thread Apr 6 03:24]
[Comm thread Apr 6 03:24] PrimeNet error 40: No assignment
[Comm thread Apr 6 03:24] This computer has already sent in this LL result for M59295007
[Comm thread Apr 6 03:24] Done communicating with server.
[Worker #1 Apr 6 03:31] Iteration: 200000 / 62423843 [0.32%]. Per iteration time: 0.024 sec.
[Worker #2 Apr 6 03:40] Iteration: 20000000 / 62283437 [32.11%]. Per iteration time: 0.024 sec.[/CODE]

garo 2014-04-07 17:46

beduzar,
This is not problem. The original message was received by the server but the response was not received by your computer. You can ignore this message.

beduzar 2014-04-07 18:35

Thanks garo. Indeed I have noticed that the result is well in the data base but it is not in my account and I did'n get any credit for it :-(

Prime95 2014-04-07 21:03

I've seen this problem before. In theory, recording the result (in 2 tables), removing the assignment, and issuing CPU credit are wrapped in a transaction. Either all updates make it to the database or none do. Clearly there is a bug and I have little experience in how to debug this on the server.

What I can do is delete the row from the LL results table and resubmit the result manually.

beduzar 2014-04-07 22:43

[QUOTE=Prime95;370484]I've seen this problem before. In theory, recording the result (in 2 tables), removing the assignment, and issuing CPU credit are wrapped in a transaction. Either all updates make it to the database or none do. Clearly there is a bug and I have little experience in how to debug this on the server.

What I can do is delete the row from the LL results table and resubmit the result manually.[/QUOTE]
OK, now the result is in my list. It appears with "Manual testing" instead of the CPU name but I suppose it does not matter. Thank you!

garo 2014-04-08 17:55

[QUOTE=beduzar;370478]Thanks garo. Indeed I have noticed that the result is well in the data base but it is not in my account and I did'n get any credit for it :-([/QUOTE]

Ooh! As Prime95 says above that is a bug on the server side.


All times are UTC. The time now is 04:56.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.