mersenneforum.org

mersenneforum.org (https://www.mersenneforum.org/index.php)
-   Aliquot Sequences (https://www.mersenneforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=90)
-   -   Archived reservation posts (https://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=14330)

gd_barnes 2009-09-28 18:17

Reserving 282276 from a comment by Karsten in the "a little request" thread.

dekcarki 2009-09-28 18:20

[quote=gd_barnes;191358]Oh, OK. Can you show it as reserved here by him?

I may take it after he is done but will post a reservation for it again.[/quote]
releasing 283752

line 4768: C93 = 2 * 20399 * C88

gd_barnes 2009-09-28 18:43

OK, re-reserving 283752 to at least 100 digits. Since it has been specifically requested, I'll start on it right away.

fivemack 2009-09-28 19:46

I'm not quite sure why I have two reservations here; I'm not doing any work on them. Please unreserve them.

Andi47 2009-09-28 19:59

[QUOTE=schickel;165249]
[code][B]Current reservations[/B]

[B][I]Sequence Who Index Size Driver/guide[/I][/B]
10212 Andi47 2191 132 [COLOR=red]2 * 3[/COLOR]
[/code][/QUOTE]

in the meanwhile it has reached index 2204, still with the 2*3 driver.

gd_barnes 2009-09-29 11:12

I'd like to reserve 584832. Is anyone aware of who might be the mystery worker who has searched several 1000 indexes on this one?

It isn't usual for the D.B. to show i=4119 while Karsten's page for W.Creyaufmueller shows i=791.

If there is a known worker, I won't reserve it.

dekcarki 2009-09-30 11:51

releasing 40320

RobertS 2009-09-30 18:13

I reserve 582828, i3787, sz100, 2^2*7

gd_barnes 2009-10-02 04:50

[quote=gd_barnes;191422]I'd like to reserve 584832. Is anyone aware of who might be the mystery worker who has searched several 1000 indexes on this one?

It isn't usual for the D.B. to show i=4119 while Karsten's page for W.Creyaufmueller shows i=791.

If there is a known worker, I won't reserve it.[/quote]

Since there worker is still a mystery, I'll "officially" reserve 584832 starting at i=4119 if that worker doesn't advance it higher in the mean time.

Greebley 2009-10-02 13:34

A whole bunch of sequences were run through before we got the data with many at 87 instead of 80 for example. If you don't know that it has changed recently, then likely it isn't being actively worked on.

In other words, being past Creyaufmueller's result is not a sign of recent activity.

BigBrother 2009-10-03 07:25

I'll take 12408 a bit further.


All times are UTC. The time now is 08:01.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.